<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 34 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21528</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for Question 1 regarding the deductibility of a contribution to a political party. However, the court sided with the assessee for Questions 2, 3, and 4, allowing deductions for expenses related to business publicity, payment to outgoing members of the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Trust, and running a football tournament. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 34 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21528</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for Question 1 regarding the deductibility of a contribution to a political party. However, the court sided with the assessee for Questions 2, 3, and 4, allowing deductions for expenses related to business publicity, payment to outgoing members of the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Trust, and running a football tournament. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>