<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1174 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the genuineness of the transaction being proven. However, the confirmation of an ad hoc disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 25,000 was upheld as the assessee had agreed to it during assessment. The impugned order was upheld, and the judgment was pronounced on February 7, 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1174 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the genuineness of the transaction being proven. However, the confirmation of an ad hoc disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 25,000 was upheld as the assessee had agreed to it during assessment. The impugned order was upheld, and the judgment was pronounced on February 7, 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>