<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1168 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392724</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing Trade Notice No.11/2018 and the order-in-original dated 29.9.2018. It held that the petitioner is entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,38,83,203/- paid towards IGST, with interest at the statutory rate, and that the amendment to Notification No.16/2015-Cus by Notification No.79/2017-Cus applies retrospectively to cover imports made during the period 1.7.2017 to 13.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1168 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392724</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing Trade Notice No.11/2018 and the order-in-original dated 29.9.2018. It held that the petitioner is entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,38,83,203/- paid towards IGST, with interest at the statutory rate, and that the amendment to Notification No.16/2015-Cus by Notification No.79/2017-Cus applies retrospectively to cover imports made during the period 1.7.2017 to 13.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>