https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286446 The writ petition, arising from a Partition suit in a Civil Court, was found to be maintainable under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court distinguished between the powers conferred by Articles 226 and 227, emphasizing their distinct nature. It held that seeking writ relief to circumvent remedies available under the Civil Procedure Code was impermissible. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the writ appeal allowed, setting aside the writ Court's order. The Court clarified that its decision did not assess the Civil Judge's order, leaving the petitioner's remedy against that order intact. No costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:14:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286446 The writ petition, arising from a Partition suit in a Civil Court, was found to be maintainable under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The Court distinguished between the powers conferred by Articles 226 and 227, emphasizing their distinct nature. It held that seeking writ relief to circumvent remedies available under the Civil Procedure Code was impermissible. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the writ appeal allowed, setting aside the writ Court's order. The Court clarified that its decision did not assess the Civil Judge's order, leaving the petitioner's remedy against that order intact. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286446