<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1152 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392708</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied its earlier ruling in Pr. CIT v. Aarham Softronic and found no basis for interference in the special leave petition. The petition was dismissed by reference to that controlling precedent, with no separate reasons recorded beyond the application of the earlier decision. Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1152 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392708</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied its earlier ruling in Pr. CIT v. Aarham Softronic and found no basis for interference in the special leave petition. The petition was dismissed by reference to that controlling precedent, with no separate reasons recorded beyond the application of the earlier decision. Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>