https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392704 The court allowed the condonation of a two-day delay in re-filing the appeal, considering it insignificant. The appeal was admitted based on the need for reconsideration of legal precedents cited by both parties. Three substantial questions of law were framed, including the taxability of interest from borrowed funds invested in fixed deposits and the application of relevant case law. The case was directed for further proceedings based on these substantial questions of law. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:01:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392704 The court allowed the condonation of a two-day delay in re-filing the appeal, considering it insignificant. The appeal was admitted based on the need for reconsideration of legal precedents cited by both parties. Three substantial questions of law were framed, including the taxability of interest from borrowed funds invested in fixed deposits and the application of relevant case law. The case was directed for further proceedings based on these substantial questions of law. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392704