<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court rules claiming inadmissible expenses doesn&#039;t justify penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52011</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the case of the revenue was that even though the material was disclosed by the assessee but he had claimed certain inadmissible expenses. Claiming of an expense which is not sustainable in itself cannot be a ground for invoking Section 271(1)(c) of the Act - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:01:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:01:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court rules claiming inadmissible expenses doesn&#039;t justify penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52011</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the case of the revenue was that even though the material was disclosed by the assessee but he had claimed certain inadmissible expenses. Claiming of an expense which is not sustainable in itself cannot be a ground for invoking Section 271(1)(c) of the Act - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:01:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>