<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1143 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 3,98,00,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the genuineness of the transactions through comprehensive documentary evidence, shifting the burden of proof to the AO, who failed to provide substantial counter-evidence. The appeal was dismissed on 21/02/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1143 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 3,98,00,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the genuineness of the transactions through comprehensive documentary evidence, shifting the burden of proof to the AO, who failed to provide substantial counter-evidence. The appeal was dismissed on 21/02/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>