<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1141 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392697</link>
    <description>Profit from the sale of rural agricultural land, being outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii), was treated as agricultural income exempt under section 10(1). Because the first Explanation to section 115JB permits reduction for income covered by sections 10, 11 or 12, and MAT operates only as an alternate computation mechanism, the resulting profit could not be included in book profit. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:46:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1141 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392697</link>
      <description>Profit from the sale of rural agricultural land, being outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii), was treated as agricultural income exempt under section 10(1). Because the first Explanation to section 115JB permits reduction for income covered by sections 10, 11 or 12, and MAT operates only as an alternate computation mechanism, the resulting profit could not be included in book profit. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>