<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286444</link>
    <description>A foreign company may invoke Article 226 against allegedly unauthorised action of a public authority, and non-citizens are not barred from seeking writ relief where no legal disability is shown. Filing on the Original Side does not defeat writ jurisdiction if part of the cause of action arose within the court&#039;s territory, so a procedural irregularity alone will not invalidate the petition. At the conciliation stage under the Industrial Disputes Act, disputed issues such as whether an employee is a workman should ordinarily be left to the statutory forum, and a fresh conciliation was not interdicted where the earlier closure had been justified by special circumstances and no illegality was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286444</link>
      <description>A foreign company may invoke Article 226 against allegedly unauthorised action of a public authority, and non-citizens are not barred from seeking writ relief where no legal disability is shown. Filing on the Original Side does not defeat writ jurisdiction if part of the cause of action arose within the court&#039;s territory, so a procedural irregularity alone will not invalidate the petition. At the conciliation stage under the Industrial Disputes Act, disputed issues such as whether an employee is a workman should ordinarily be left to the statutory forum, and a fresh conciliation was not interdicted where the earlier closure had been justified by special circumstances and no illegality was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>