<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1137 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392693</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of a customs notification and the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers to issue show cause notices. The court found that DRI officers had been appointed as Commissioners of Customs with jurisdiction over the entire country. It allowed the show cause notice to proceed, stating that the petitioners could raise their arguments during the adjudication process. The interim arrangement was continued for six weeks from the judgment date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1137 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392693</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of a customs notification and the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers to issue show cause notices. The court found that DRI officers had been appointed as Commissioners of Customs with jurisdiction over the entire country. It allowed the show cause notice to proceed, stating that the petitioners could raise their arguments during the adjudication process. The interim arrangement was continued for six weeks from the judgment date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>