https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392669 The Tribunal considered restoring dismissed appeals due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite acknowledging the delay and lack of initial mention of financial difficulties, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of full compliance with adjudged dues within four weeks for restoration. The applicants were directed to deposit the entire adjudged dues within the specified timeframe, with restoration contingent upon timely compliance. Failure to comply within the stipulated period would lead to automatic dismissal of the restoration applications. The matter was disposed of with further orders scheduled for a specified date. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:48:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392669 The Tribunal considered restoring dismissed appeals due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite acknowledging the delay and lack of initial mention of financial difficulties, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of full compliance with adjudged dues within four weeks for restoration. The applicants were directed to deposit the entire adjudged dues within the specified timeframe, with restoration contingent upon timely compliance. Failure to comply within the stipulated period would lead to automatic dismissal of the restoration applications. The matter was disposed of with further orders scheduled for a specified date. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392669