https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21512 Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction should not be used to quash pending criminal proceedings when the accused has effective remedies before the trial court and the trial has reached an advanced stage, including examination under Section 313(a). The Court noted that similar objections had already been considered in an earlier petition, several witnesses had been examined, and the present grounds could be raised before the trial court at the stage of framing of charges or discharge. The second quash petition was therefore treated as an attempt to delay the trial and was dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:54:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21512 Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction should not be used to quash pending criminal proceedings when the accused has effective remedies before the trial court and the trial has reached an advanced stage, including examination under Section 313(a). The Court noted that similar objections had already been considered in an earlier petition, several witnesses had been examined, and the present grounds could be raised before the trial court at the stage of framing of charges or discharge. The second quash petition was therefore treated as an attempt to delay the trial and was dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21512