<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1578 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against the respondent, a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting the claim that the Corporate Debtor engaged the Operational Creditor for securing financial assistance, as there was no agreement to pay the service charges claimed. The absence of essential documents and a plausible dispute regarding the outstanding amount led to the conclusion that insolvency proceedings were not warranted. The petition was rejected, and the file was consigned to the record room.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1578 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against the respondent, a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found no evidence supporting the claim that the Corporate Debtor engaged the Operational Creditor for securing financial assistance, as there was no agreement to pay the service charges claimed. The absence of essential documents and a plausible dispute regarding the outstanding amount led to the conclusion that insolvency proceedings were not warranted. The petition was rejected, and the file was consigned to the record room.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>