https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286426 Article 14 review was available to a foreign company challenging tender conditions, but only on grounds of arbitrariness or unreasonableness, because Article 19(1)(g) is confined to citizens. The tendering authority was entitled to prescribe specialised eligibility criteria, including prior experience in operating a visa centre for a diplomatic mission and handling a specified application volume, where those conditions reflected operational requirements. The conditions were found neither malicious nor tailor-made to exclude competition, and there was no inconsistency with the governing financial rules or bidding guidelines. In tender matters, the prescribing authority retains wide latitude, and eligibility terms will not be struck down absent arbitrariness, discrimination, or violation of Article 14. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286426 Article 14 review was available to a foreign company challenging tender conditions, but only on grounds of arbitrariness or unreasonableness, because Article 19(1)(g) is confined to citizens. The tendering authority was entitled to prescribe specialised eligibility criteria, including prior experience in operating a visa centre for a diplomatic mission and handling a specified application volume, where those conditions reflected operational requirements. The conditions were found neither malicious nor tailor-made to exclude competition, and there was no inconsistency with the governing financial rules or bidding guidelines. In tender matters, the prescribing authority retains wide latitude, and eligibility terms will not be struck down absent arbitrariness, discrimination, or violation of Article 14. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286426