<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the excess penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 to the appellant due to the reduction in penalty amount. It clarified the distinction between fine and penalty, ensuring the appellant was not unfairly disadvantaged by clerical errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:34:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the excess penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 to the appellant due to the reduction in penalty amount. It clarified the distinction between fine and penalty, ensuring the appellant was not unfairly disadvantaged by clerical errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>