<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1104 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392660</link>
    <description>The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to carry forward unutilized credit under the GST regime, emphasizing that this right is vested and cannot be denied on procedural or technical grounds. It directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to file or revise the GST TRAN-1 form by a specified date, ensuring that technicalities do not hinder taxpayers&#039; legitimate rights. The decision aligns with previous judgments recognizing the importance of upholding vested rights and avoiding arbitrary denials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1104 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392660</link>
      <description>The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to carry forward unutilized credit under the GST regime, emphasizing that this right is vested and cannot be denied on procedural or technical grounds. It directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to file or revise the GST TRAN-1 form by a specified date, ensuring that technicalities do not hinder taxpayers&#039; legitimate rights. The decision aligns with previous judgments recognizing the importance of upholding vested rights and avoiding arbitrary denials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>