<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1094 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Stay Application, extending the stay on the outstanding demand of Rs. 115,46,26,840. This decision was based on the prima facie case in favor of the assessee, the balance of convenience, and the absence of changes in facts from the previous stay extension. The Tribunal considered the delay in appeal disposal, financial position explanation, MAT credit allowance, plea rejection, and intervenor status in reaching this outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:51:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1094 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Stay Application, extending the stay on the outstanding demand of Rs. 115,46,26,840. This decision was based on the prima facie case in favor of the assessee, the balance of convenience, and the absence of changes in facts from the previous stay extension. The Tribunal considered the delay in appeal disposal, financial position explanation, MAT credit allowance, plea rejection, and intervenor status in reaching this outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>