<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1093 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392649</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the genuine nature of transactions involving urgent funds for medical treatment from close family members, which were not considered loans or deposits. As the transactions were found to be genuine and made for reasonable causes, the penalty was deemed unjustified, aligning with the legislative intent to prevent tax evasion rather than penalize legitimate emergency payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1093 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392649</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the genuine nature of transactions involving urgent funds for medical treatment from close family members, which were not considered loans or deposits. As the transactions were found to be genuine and made for reasonable causes, the penalty was deemed unjustified, aligning with the legislative intent to prevent tax evasion rather than penalize legitimate emergency payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>