https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392647 The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The revenue failed to provide concrete evidence supporting the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the transactions, complying with all requirements and submitting sufficient documentation. Consequently, the appeal by the revenue was rejected, and the order was issued on 04/02/2020. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:48:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392647 The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The revenue failed to provide concrete evidence supporting the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had adequately proven the genuineness of the transactions, complying with all requirements and submitting sufficient documentation. Consequently, the appeal by the revenue was rejected, and the order was issued on 04/02/2020. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392647