<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. Consequently, the legal issue regarding the validity of the enhancement became academic and was rendered infructuous. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:47:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. Consequently, the legal issue regarding the validity of the enhancement became academic and was rendered infructuous. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>