<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1085 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392641</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. cannot be denied merely because invoice descriptions create a hyper-technical correlation issue, where the documentary record, including invoices, a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, and proof of sales tax/VAT payment, establishes that the imported goods were the same goods sold and the refund conditions were otherwise satisfied. The commentary also notes that an order passed by a successor authority without giving the assessee an effective post-transfer hearing is inconsistent with fairness in adjudication. On these grounds, the refund claim was restored with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1085 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392641</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. cannot be denied merely because invoice descriptions create a hyper-technical correlation issue, where the documentary record, including invoices, a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, and proof of sales tax/VAT payment, establishes that the imported goods were the same goods sold and the refund conditions were otherwise satisfied. The commentary also notes that an order passed by a successor authority without giving the assessee an effective post-transfer hearing is inconsistent with fairness in adjudication. On these grounds, the refund claim was restored with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>