<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1084 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal due to a delay of 587 days in filing, citing the statutory limit of 90 days under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal ruled that the Commissioner (Appeals) can only condone a delay of up to 30 days beyond the 60-day limit for filing an appeal. The judgment aligned with the precedent established by the Supreme Court in a similar case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on statutory limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1084 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal due to a delay of 587 days in filing, citing the statutory limit of 90 days under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal ruled that the Commissioner (Appeals) can only condone a delay of up to 30 days beyond the 60-day limit for filing an appeal. The judgment aligned with the precedent established by the Supreme Court in a similar case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on statutory limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>