<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392639</link>
    <description>The CESTAT dismissed the appeals of the appellants involved in mis-declaration and duty drawback fraud for non-prosecution. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of the CHA and freight forwarder, finding no evidence of their knowledge of the fraud, thus negating penalties under Section 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392639</link>
      <description>The CESTAT dismissed the appeals of the appellants involved in mis-declaration and duty drawback fraud for non-prosecution. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of the CHA and freight forwarder, finding no evidence of their knowledge of the fraud, thus negating penalties under Section 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>