<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1081 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392637</link>
    <description>The court set aside the NCLAT and NCLT orders in an appeal by the former MD &amp;amp; CEO of Punjab National Bank. It held that freezing assets under Sections 337 and 339 of the Companies Act is limited to individuals directly involved in mismanagement or fraudulent conduct of the specific company under investigation. The judgment clarified that this decision does not affect ongoing investigations by CBI or SFIO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:13:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1081 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392637</link>
      <description>The court set aside the NCLAT and NCLT orders in an appeal by the former MD &amp;amp; CEO of Punjab National Bank. It held that freezing assets under Sections 337 and 339 of the Companies Act is limited to individuals directly involved in mismanagement or fraudulent conduct of the specific company under investigation. The judgment clarified that this decision does not affect ongoing investigations by CBI or SFIO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>