<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1072 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392628</link>
    <description>MSME-based exemption under section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies only when the corporate debtor affirmatively proves valid MSME status under the governing registration and memorandum requirements. A mere acknowledgement of an application for registration does not confer legal status or entitlement under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. On that basis, the resolution professional was not required to treat the promoter-director as a permissible resolution applicant or revise the expression of interest, and the challenge to the rejection of the bid failed because the rejection was for non-compliance with EOI requirements, not solely for section 29A disqualification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 06:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1072 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392628</link>
      <description>MSME-based exemption under section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies only when the corporate debtor affirmatively proves valid MSME status under the governing registration and memorandum requirements. A mere acknowledgement of an application for registration does not confer legal status or entitlement under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. On that basis, the resolution professional was not required to treat the promoter-director as a permissible resolution applicant or revise the expression of interest, and the challenge to the rejection of the bid failed because the rejection was for non-compliance with EOI requirements, not solely for section 29A disqualification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>