<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21502</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee fell under section 104(4)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and was not liable for additional income tax for assessment years 1971-72 and 1973-74. The judgment clarified that the Explanation did not limit the scope of section 104(4)(a) and applied to companies engaged solely in specified business activities. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21502</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee fell under section 104(4)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and was not liable for additional income tax for assessment years 1971-72 and 1973-74. The judgment clarified that the Explanation did not limit the scope of section 104(4)(a) and applied to companies engaged solely in specified business activities. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>