https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286407 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the confiscation and redemption fine imposed on the appellant for importing contaminated goods. The penalty was set aside as unjustified, considering the steps taken by the appellant to comply with regulations. The Tribunal found discrepancies in certification between the Port of Export and Import, rendering the goods ineligible for clearance into India. The decision was pronounced openly on 29-5-2018, clarifying the issues raised and the Tribunal's findings. en-us Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286407 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the confiscation and redemption fine imposed on the appellant for importing contaminated goods. The penalty was set aside as unjustified, considering the steps taken by the appellant to comply with regulations. The Tribunal found discrepancies in certification between the Port of Export and Import, rendering the goods ineligible for clearance into India. The decision was pronounced openly on 29-5-2018, clarifying the issues raised and the Tribunal's findings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286407