<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1323 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286414</link>
    <description>The High Court confirmed the sale of a property in Gurgaon in favor of M/s. Fashion Accessories after the successful bidder deposited the balance bid amount within the stipulated time. The Court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of the property and execute the necessary sale deed. In a separate application, the petitioner sought possession of another property and factory building, expressing readiness to pay security charges. The Court directed the Official Liquidator to respond and scheduled further hearing. The judgments by Ms. Jyoti Singh, J., ensured compliance with auction terms, addressed possession issues, and upheld parties&#039; rights in the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:50:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1323 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286414</link>
      <description>The High Court confirmed the sale of a property in Gurgaon in favor of M/s. Fashion Accessories after the successful bidder deposited the balance bid amount within the stipulated time. The Court directed the Official Liquidator to hand over possession of the property and execute the necessary sale deed. In a separate application, the petitioner sought possession of another property and factory building, expressing readiness to pay security charges. The Court directed the Official Liquidator to respond and scheduled further hearing. The judgments by Ms. Jyoti Singh, J., ensured compliance with auction terms, addressed possession issues, and upheld parties&#039; rights in the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>