<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The transactions were considered accommodation entries for claiming bogus Short Term Capital Loss, lacking genuine economic or financial rationale. The additions under Sections 68 and 69C were deemed justified based on the evidence and analysis provided by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The transactions were considered accommodation entries for claiming bogus Short Term Capital Loss, lacking genuine economic or financial rationale. The additions under Sections 68 and 69C were deemed justified based on the evidence and analysis provided by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>