https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392584 The court partly allowed the petition, quashing the orders demanding additional documents and directing the respondent to process the refund claim within 30 days based on the existing evidence. The court ruled the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refund amount due to the delay caused by the respondent. The request for a stay on the order was rejected, considering the prolonged delay in processing the refund. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392584 The court partly allowed the petition, quashing the orders demanding additional documents and directing the respondent to process the refund claim within 30 days based on the existing evidence. The court ruled the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refund amount due to the delay caused by the respondent. The request for a stay on the order was rejected, considering the prolonged delay in processing the refund. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392584