https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392581 The High Court held that the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) could refer a matter to a larger bench despite a Supreme Court decision on a similar issue. The Court emphasized that the CESTAT's order referring the matter to a larger bench did not warrant interference, noting that the facts of the case were distinguishable from the precedent. The Court also found that the CESTAT's order was an interim one and did not prejudice the petitioner, ultimately disposing of the petition and discharging the notice. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392581 The High Court held that the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) could refer a matter to a larger bench despite a Supreme Court decision on a similar issue. The Court emphasized that the CESTAT's order referring the matter to a larger bench did not warrant interference, noting that the facts of the case were distinguishable from the precedent. The Court also found that the CESTAT's order was an interim one and did not prejudice the petitioner, ultimately disposing of the petition and discharging the notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392581