https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392566 The judgment addresses the non-prosecution by the Appellant, confiscation of goods without proper documentation, and imposition of penalties. It highlights the Appellant's lack of interest in pursuing the appeal, leading to the Department's unsuccessful attempts to serve notice. The case involves the confiscation of goods due to discrepancies in documentation, with subsequent modifications made based on findings. The judgment concludes that the Appellant's penalty had already been waived, questioning the sustainability of the confiscation order. Penalties on the Appellant and others were waived previously, emphasizing genuine misunderstandings in duty provisions. The judgment ultimately allows the appeal in favor of the Appellant. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:56:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392566 The judgment addresses the non-prosecution by the Appellant, confiscation of goods without proper documentation, and imposition of penalties. It highlights the Appellant's lack of interest in pursuing the appeal, leading to the Department's unsuccessful attempts to serve notice. The case involves the confiscation of goods due to discrepancies in documentation, with subsequent modifications made based on findings. The judgment concludes that the Appellant's penalty had already been waived, questioning the sustainability of the confiscation order. Penalties on the Appellant and others were waived previously, emphasizing genuine misunderstandings in duty provisions. The judgment ultimately allows the appeal in favor of the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392566