<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392560</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant Cenvat Credit on disputed services including security services, welfare activities, and hiring of buses for employee transportation. The decision highlighted the importance of these services in the unique operational context of the remote mining locations, emphasizing their direct link to business operations. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, recognizing the eligibility of these services for Cenvat Credit under the Cenvat Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392560</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the Appellant Cenvat Credit on disputed services including security services, welfare activities, and hiring of buses for employee transportation. The decision highlighted the importance of these services in the unique operational context of the remote mining locations, emphasizing their direct link to business operations. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, recognizing the eligibility of these services for Cenvat Credit under the Cenvat Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>