<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1761 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286370</link>
    <description>Goods stored in the appellant&#039;s warehouse at the instance of customs authorities remained uncleared for several years, and the delay was not attributable to the appellant. As the goods were stated to be unfit for consumption and there was no justification for continued storage in the appellant&#039;s premises, the tribunal held that further retention was unwarranted. The respondent was directed to remove the goods from the warehouse within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:46:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1761 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286370</link>
      <description>Goods stored in the appellant&#039;s warehouse at the instance of customs authorities remained uncleared for several years, and the delay was not attributable to the appellant. As the goods were stated to be unfit for consumption and there was no justification for continued storage in the appellant&#039;s premises, the tribunal held that further retention was unwarranted. The respondent was directed to remove the goods from the warehouse within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>