<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21485</link>
    <description>The expenditure of Rs. 20,00,598 incurred for constructing a road was classified as capital expenditure by the Tribunal, creating a tangible asset with enduring benefits. The assessee&#039;s claim for revenue expenditure was rejected, emphasizing the ownership of the road by the assessee and allowing depreciation claims. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, favoring the revenue, with no separate judgments delivered by the judges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21485</link>
      <description>The expenditure of Rs. 20,00,598 incurred for constructing a road was classified as capital expenditure by the Tribunal, creating a tangible asset with enduring benefits. The assessee&#039;s claim for revenue expenditure was rejected, emphasizing the ownership of the road by the assessee and allowing depreciation claims. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, favoring the revenue, with no separate judgments delivered by the judges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>