<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 992 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392548</link>
    <description>The Chhattisgarh State Bar Council&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 10(23A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 continued after State reorganisation because it remained the same statutory body discharging the functions assigned under the Advocates Act, 1961. A fresh exemption application in the new Council&#039;s name was treated as a technical consequence of reorganisation, not a ground to deny the substantive tax benefit where the earlier exemption had already been granted to the Bar Council of the undivided State. The statutory scheme and institutional continuity supported extension of the exemption, and relief for the prior years was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:11:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 992 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392548</link>
      <description>The Chhattisgarh State Bar Council&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 10(23A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 continued after State reorganisation because it remained the same statutory body discharging the functions assigned under the Advocates Act, 1961. A fresh exemption application in the new Council&#039;s name was treated as a technical consequence of reorganisation, not a ground to deny the substantive tax benefit where the earlier exemption had already been granted to the Bar Council of the undivided State. The statutory scheme and institutional continuity supported extension of the exemption, and relief for the prior years was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>