<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 987 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all four appeals of the assessee for statistical purposes. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) concerning the cost of construction, agricultural income, and additional personal drawings. These matters were remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh decisions with reasoned orders after providing both parties with reasonable opportunities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 987 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed all four appeals of the assessee for statistical purposes. The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) concerning the cost of construction, agricultural income, and additional personal drawings. These matters were remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh decisions with reasoned orders after providing both parties with reasonable opportunities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>