<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 964 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392520</link>
    <description>Services supplied from a Free Trade Warehousing Zone to foreign recipients for consideration in convertible foreign exchange were treated as export of services under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. The Act&#039;s exemption for taxable services supplied from a Special Economic Zone to a place outside India, together with its overriding effect, prevailed over inconsistent service tax rules and place-of-provision objections, so the service tax demand on storage and warehousing services was set aside. Amounts described as reimbursements lacked sufficient supporting documents, so the related demand was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 964 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392520</link>
      <description>Services supplied from a Free Trade Warehousing Zone to foreign recipients for consideration in convertible foreign exchange were treated as export of services under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005. The Act&#039;s exemption for taxable services supplied from a Special Economic Zone to a place outside India, together with its overriding effect, prevailed over inconsistent service tax rules and place-of-provision objections, so the service tax demand on storage and warehousing services was set aside. Amounts described as reimbursements lacked sufficient supporting documents, so the related demand was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>