<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1512 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of discount/rebate and penalty imposition, highlighting the contractual nature of the payment. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was quashed due to the overturning of the disallowance. The orders from January 15, 2009, and July 23, 2009, were set aside, with the appeals partly and fully allowed, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1512 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the disallowance of discount/rebate and penalty imposition, highlighting the contractual nature of the payment. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was quashed due to the overturning of the disallowance. The orders from January 15, 2009, and July 23, 2009, were set aside, with the appeals partly and fully allowed, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>