<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286358</link>
    <description>Loss caused by a cashier&#039;s embezzlement in the course of a money-lending business was treated as a trading loss where the misappropriation arose directly from the business and was incidental to it under ordinary commercial principles. The court noted that employing a cashier and entrusting cash to him were normal incidents of such business, and the loss was sustained in the year of account. The amount was therefore deductible in computing business income, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286358</link>
      <description>Loss caused by a cashier&#039;s embezzlement in the course of a money-lending business was treated as a trading loss where the misappropriation arose directly from the business and was incidental to it under ordinary commercial principles. The court noted that employing a cashier and entrusting cash to him were normal incidents of such business, and the loss was sustained in the year of account. The amount was therefore deductible in computing business income, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>