https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21480 The appellate court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a 3/4ths share in the suit property, while the defendant's legal heir was entitled to a 1/4th share. The court found that the property was purchased with funds provided by the defendant, making it a benami transaction to the extent of the plaintiff's inclusion in the sale deed. Consequently, the court set aside the lower court's judgment, ordered the property to be divided accordingly, and directed each party to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21480 The appellate court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a 3/4ths share in the suit property, while the defendant's legal heir was entitled to a 1/4th share. The court found that the property was purchased with funds provided by the defendant, making it a benami transaction to the extent of the plaintiff's inclusion in the sale deed. Consequently, the court set aside the lower court's judgment, ordered the property to be divided accordingly, and directed each party to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 19 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21480