<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116045</link>
    <description>Tax department issued notices for Form C on interstate sales for specified years; taxpayer did not reply and an order for one year was passed without personal hearing. The question is whether section 22(2)&#039;s deemed assessment cut off for the 2006-07 to 2011-12 period bars reopening, and a reported authority (Victus Dyeings) was cited as support to invoke the limitation bar and seek quashing of any reopened assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:13:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116045</link>
      <description>Tax department issued notices for Form C on interstate sales for specified years; taxpayer did not reply and an order for one year was passed without personal hearing. The question is whether section 22(2)&#039;s deemed assessment cut off for the 2006-07 to 2011-12 period bars reopening, and a reported authority (Victus Dyeings) was cited as support to invoke the limitation bar and seek quashing of any reopened assessments.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:13:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>