https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392513 The National Anti-Profiteering Authority found that the Respondent violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act by not passing on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit to recipients. The profiteered amount of Rs. 35,28,744 was to be refunded to 397 flat owners with interest. The NAA confirmed its jurisdiction and directed further investigations into the Respondent's other projects for compliance. Compliance monitoring was assigned to the jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392513 The National Anti-Profiteering Authority found that the Respondent violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act by not passing on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit to recipients. The profiteered amount of Rs. 35,28,744 was to be refunded to 397 flat owners with interest. The NAA confirmed its jurisdiction and directed further investigations into the Respondent's other projects for compliance. Compliance monitoring was assigned to the jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana. Case-Laws GST Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392513