<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 21 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21474</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. It held that section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act applies retrospectively to the assessment year 1975-76. The court found that the assessee validly exercised the option under section 7(4) in time, entitling them to its benefits. Additionally, the court emphasized the importance of valuation consistency with co-sharers and deemed the reference to the Valuation Officer invalid due to the valid exercise of the option by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 21 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21474</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. It held that section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act applies retrospectively to the assessment year 1975-76. The court found that the assessee validly exercised the option under section 7(4) in time, entitling them to its benefits. Additionally, the court emphasized the importance of valuation consistency with co-sharers and deemed the reference to the Valuation Officer invalid due to the valid exercise of the option by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>