<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 952 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392508</link>
    <description>Rejection of a revision application solely because an appeal remedy was available was held unsustainable, as the authority had not considered the merits of the request under the Income-tax Act. The prior decision of the same High Court on a similar order was relied on, and the revenue did not dispute its applicability. The impugned order was quashed, and the Commissioner was directed to reconsider the revision application on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:08:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 952 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392508</link>
      <description>Rejection of a revision application solely because an appeal remedy was available was held unsustainable, as the authority had not considered the merits of the request under the Income-tax Act. The prior decision of the same High Court on a similar order was relied on, and the revenue did not dispute its applicability. The impugned order was quashed, and the Commissioner was directed to reconsider the revision application on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>