<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s stay petition in an Income Tax Appeal concerning an exemption claim under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no prima facie case in favor of the appellant based on incriminating materials, leading to the admission of a Tax Case Appeal on substantial questions of law. Despite arguments on transaction genuineness, the focus remained on the dismissal of the stay petition. The Court directed the appellant to deposit a further sum in installments for interim stay, emphasizing justice and fairness. The judgment underscored the need for a balanced approach in addressing tax demands and stay petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s stay petition in an Income Tax Appeal concerning an exemption claim under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no prima facie case in favor of the appellant based on incriminating materials, leading to the admission of a Tax Case Appeal on substantial questions of law. Despite arguments on transaction genuineness, the focus remained on the dismissal of the stay petition. The Court directed the appellant to deposit a further sum in installments for interim stay, emphasizing justice and fairness. The judgment underscored the need for a balanced approach in addressing tax demands and stay petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>