https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286338 Joint labour by members of a larger undivided family does not by itself make property joint family property in the Mitakshara sense; the evidence here did not establish a distinct branch family or incorporation of the acquisitions into family property, so that claim failed. The surrounding conduct, however, supported an implied partnership in the contract business, and the plaintiff was treated as a partner because his participation had been permitted without objection. A suit for account after the business relationship had ended had to be brought within limitation; as the partnership had broken down years earlier and the claim was delayed, the suit was time-barred. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1901 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:26:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286338 Joint labour by members of a larger undivided family does not by itself make property joint family property in the Mitakshara sense; the evidence here did not establish a distinct branch family or incorporation of the acquisitions into family property, so that claim failed. The surrounding conduct, however, supported an implied partnership in the contract business, and the plaintiff was treated as a partner because his participation had been permitted without objection. A suit for account after the business relationship had ended had to be brought within limitation; as the partnership had broken down years earlier and the claim was delayed, the suit was time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Sep 1901 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286338