<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 939 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392495</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the delay in filing was condoned, and the expenditure of Rs. 60,25,240/- for repairs and maintenance to maintain the hotel&#039;s 3-star status was classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal held that the expenses did not create a new asset but were incurred to preserve the existing status, making them eligible for deduction under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 939 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392495</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the delay in filing was condoned, and the expenditure of Rs. 60,25,240/- for repairs and maintenance to maintain the hotel&#039;s 3-star status was classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal held that the expenses did not create a new asset but were incurred to preserve the existing status, making them eligible for deduction under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>