<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 938 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392494</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to a defective notice under Section 274 that did not specify the charge against the assessee. As a result, the penalty imposed was canceled, and the appeal was allowed. The tribunal stressed the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty notices to adhere to the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 938 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392494</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to a defective notice under Section 274 that did not specify the charge against the assessee. As a result, the penalty imposed was canceled, and the appeal was allowed. The tribunal stressed the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty notices to adhere to the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>